This park by my house knows how to differentiate on a budget. “Designed for ages 5 – 12.” The play set scales to fit abilities, not ages. And, yes, I absolutely see kids aged 5-12 enjoying the it.
How can this be? Don’t we need separate equipment for each grade? Isn’t it inappropriate to let a 3rd grader play on the same play set as a 6th grader!?
Natural Differentiation
This play set has room for natural differentiation. A 5-year-old who is a great climber can get up high. A 10-year-old who’s scared of heights will play on the lower areas. A child who’s almost ready to climb to the top can watch other children and copy them. Kids who like swings can swing. Those who want shade, can sit in the shade.
And the best part? There’s actually a sticker above that sticker! Ages 2 – 12!!
And yep I’ve seen 2 year olds on the same darn playground equipment as the 12 year olds. YES I’ve even seen teenagers on that play set. Gosh, I guess I’ve even played on it while chasing my kid. And I am not 12!
One play set works across so many ages and abilities.
Imagine An “Above-Level Age 5 Play Set”
Now, how ridiculous would it be if the playground had different equipment for every age?
“Oh, Jimmy, you use the Age 5 equipment. Linda, go play on the Age 9 play set!”
And then, to “differentiate,” you’d need:
- A below-level, age 5 play set
- An on-level, age 5 play set
- A high-ability, age 5 play set
Three play sets for every single age. Obviously silly. Who would do such a thing?
And yet…
Three of Every Lesson
That’s EXACTLY how I approached my classroom! Three versions of each lesson. (No wonder I burned out.) And the 5th grade teacher made three versions of their lessons. And the 4th grade teacher made three versions of their lessons. Heck, my grade-level partner made three different versions of the same lessons I was teaching!!
And none of our stuff was that great because we all had too much to do.
Why was the 4th grade teacher trying to make an “advanced 4th grade fraction project” when she could have just used the existing 5th or 6th grade material? 4th grade math is just a scaffolded version of 5th grade math, after all. It’s not some isolated island. (Plus a huge chunk of 4th grade students are already ready for 5th and 6th grade material (and beyond). You can read the research on that here!)
Content Is A Continuum
So, rather than make three different versions of each lesson, look at your content as a continuum. It starts highly-scaffolded in kindergarten and loses scaffolds as you move towards 12th grade. But those scaffolds are arbitrary. Someone just had to say, “ok this is 4th grade math.” But there’s obviously no such thing as “4th grade math.” That’s as silly as an “On-Level 4th Grade Play Set.”
So know what they teach in the grades two or three years above you. Understand how to naturally move students along the continuum. When you aim high, and then scaffold down, you don’t need to make so many darn things. You can just remove scaffolds! Differentiation does not mean “create three versions of everything.”